http://chronicle.com/article/Graduate-School-in-the/44846Reading this piece made me angry, but I have to give the guy props for doing his job as a professor and making a reader think critically about a text.
His basic thesis is that undergraduates in the humanities today don't understand the danger of attending graduate school with limited plans and finances. He makes grand generalizations (as may be his only option in making the point) that
humanities undergrads in today's recession are over-praised for their inflated brilliance and
refuse to accept the reality that going to grad school won't actually postpone their anxieties about the real world.
Now, maybe I come from a pool of above-average undergrad specimens, but I don't think
any undergrads I know in the humanities are guilty of the misinformed perspective this William Pannapacker accuses us of. (Pannapacker is his real name - the article is written under his pen name, Benton, and then the footer divulges his real name, which I think is counterproductive.) No student I know would seriously pursue a PhD solely to create a safety net of professorship for themselves, even in this job market. Pannapacker seems to think a lot of us are planning to do this.
Young people can certainly be idealistic, and I'm sure there are a lot of college juniors and seniors whose inflated grades and praise have led them to believe that a life in academia is their passion. But how dare anyone invalidate that belief? It's hard to make my own generalizations, since I also have idealized principles about the "real world," but it seems that Pannapacker is trying to be a parent where he shouldn't, and he's doing so badly. He is, perhaps well-intentioned in his own way, trying to show undergrads in the humanities how to avoid misconceptions he suffered himself.
But he's going about it all wrong - accusing us of mass ignorance of the real world is hardly a fair option. Clearly, he did all right for himself by learning from his own early ignorance, eventually becoming a professor and loving it so much he has to write about it for scholarly publications. But thousands of others have learned differently from the same flawed assumptions about grad school and have turned away from it, going on to live valuable lives in some other way. Or maybe gone through with it and realized their mistake too late, only to find their passion somewhere else.
Or maybe they had a completely different set of mistakes altogether and currently sit floundering in a cardboard box in the South Bronx. Maybe I believe too much in societal predestination, but I generally think people's individual choices won't be the end of the world, and it's silly to assume that anyone's dreams (whether they're actual dreams or misinformed dreams) should be disparaged the way they are by Pannapacker.
Anyway, I also think that Pannapacker's own take on the matter is influenced by the volume of communications he has had with advice-seeking undergrads. He says the majority are spoiled A-students incapable of hearing any ignominious word against them. But it's just like the comments on YouTube - when there is so much text from so many people you don't know, you're bound to think they re all idiots, bar none. That's something we're all guilty of, but at least on YouTube nobody tells you to get
less of an education.